Aston Villa's FA Cup comeback last weekend - rallying from being down 2-0 at the half, to eventually win 4-2 - raised a lot of interest into Martin O'Neill's team talk at halftime. Several of the English papers gave credit to O'Neill, attributing the turnaround to the Villa boss’s rousing words in the dressing room.
The role of the manager at halftime is primarily to go over tactical changes within their team - adapting to tactics of the opposition, making potential alignment or personnel changes, and potentially to help motivate their team as they prepare to take the field in the second half.
Gabriele Marcotti of the Times analyses the significance of the team talk, and looks over statistical data to see which English Premier League managers have the most influence over their teams after their team talks.
Being a natural skeptic, it seemed bizarre and somewhat non-sensical that a manager’s words at half-time could have such an immediate impact. (And, if you listened to The Game Podcast, you’ll know I’m very much in the minority). Sure, I can obviously see how if players are demotivated or listless a manger can refocus and energize them.
And yes, I can see how tactical or positional changes can improve a team’s performance. But when a side scores so soon into the second half, I figured there might be other, more plausible factors. Like, perhaps, the weaker team losing its rhythm. Or the stronger team (in this case Villa) simply regressing to the mean. Or even something as sheer happenstance.
It occurred to me that if O’Neill really had a gift for the half-time team talk then Villa would consistently perform better after the break than at any other time in the match. Thanks to these folks I was able to check it out. And, as you can see, Villa’s goal difference (8 goals scored, 1 conceded) is better in the 15 minutes after half-time than any other time. Which would suggest O’Neill’s half-time talks do have an impact.
No comments:
Post a Comment